
Back at the end of January, when President Hinckley passed away, it was quite a new experience for me. During the course of my life, there have now been 5 different prophets to lead the church. There was President Kimball (I was 4 when he died), President Benson, President Hunter, President Hinckley and now President Monson. I remember hearing on the news that President Benson has passed away, but I was only 13 years old, so I don’t really remember the process that the Church went through to replace him with President Hinckley.
Now that I am a little (or a lot) older, I understand the process of calling new prophets a lot better than I did when I was 13. There is, and always has been, a process and an order to how the Church goes about calling new prophets. This process is done through inspiration from the Lord. Personally, I don’t doubt this process and I know that’s it’s all done by inspiration from the Lord. It could be done in no other way.
A couple of days ago, I was just randomly reading the article in the Salt Lake Tribune about the recent calling of Elder Christofferson to the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles. The article itself wasn’t anything spectacular or anything, but it was the reader comments that caught my attention.
Now before I go any further, I just want to say that I am very aware of how imperfect I am. And in no way do I try to judge others and what they do within their own lives. Everyone on Earth has a completely different set of circumstances and we all deal with our own trials in our own ways. But in the comments of this article, I found a point of view that I’ve never really come across before.
There is a poster that goes by “LDS mom” and I just want to post some of her comments first.
I noticed the new YW president is Pres. Monson’s daughter…….. sigh….. I don’t understand why the GA’s are usually wealthy, white LDS who live in or around SLC? I can’t help but think Pres. Monson may be playing favorites.
Dissapointed…
This lady, “LDS mom” has about 6 other posts that I can no longer access. But to start it all off, she was talking about how Elder Christofferson being called as an apostle was “just another white rich guy from Salt Lake City”, and she also talked about how “ashamed she was in her church sometimes.” And so another poster kind of called her out and basically asked her why she was still an active member of the Church if she didn’t believe that it was the Lord inspiring the calling of new apostles. He made a very good point, I thought.
And so this is what she wrote as a reply:
Relocated Southerner,
I find no sin in questioning my religion… I find no doctrine in the standard works that says we are not allowed to question teachings or programs or people…. on the contrary, as a LDS I have always believed ferverenty that we are to question, think deeply and ponder….. to follow the status quo and to fail to think for one self is truly the prototype of “sheeple”…. God would have us be an intelling people, a people who think and ponder & pray.
Shall I be condemened because I question things?
Did not J.Smith question the standar quo of religious doctrines of his day? Shall he be called a heretic?
For the poster who clarified that it is Sis. Dibb who is Pres. Monson’s daughter – thank you for the clarification! I feel much better knowing that she is not the President of the YW but counselor.
Sincere regards to ya’ll
Like I said, there are other posts prior to these that are all along the same lines. And the point of view that this lady has just boggles my mind. I cannot wrap my head around where she is coming from.
I understand that the testimony of every single member of the Church isn’t always at it’s strongest point. Heck, mine sure has had it’s ups and downs, even recently. But I always thought and assumed that if a member had a serious question about the inspiration of the Church’s leaders, they would just not go to church and basically become inactive. I’ve met tons of members who don’t believe that there is a true prophet on the Earth today and that the 12 apostles are called of God. And without fail, these members have all fallen away and are usually inactive. It just makes sense that if you don’t know or at least believe that God calls His servants, especially those who lead and run this Church, you would not want to be involved and active in the Church.
Am I way off about this? I mean, I don’t bring all this up to criticize this mystery lady who lives somewhere in Utah. I just don’t really get where she is coming from, especially in that last comment. Like she says, it doesn’t hurt one bit to question what you believe and why. Sure, everyone needs to find their own way to the truth in life. But in a Church that is built on modern-day inspiration and revelation, doesn’t it make sense that most of it’s active members likewise believe that God uses inspiration to call the Prophet and the 12 apostles, not to mention stake presidents, bishops, young women’s presidents, etc. Who are we, as lowly beings, to question the inspiration of the Lord?
All I bring this up to say is this: that I know that the Lord leads His church on the Earth today. I know that even though most of the 12 apostles are “rich, white men”, that they are inspired men and they are called of God. I know that Joseph Smith was called as a prophet back in 1820. And yes, he was questioning some of the beliefs of the churches at that time, but this is because these beliefs were wrong. That is the main difference between him questioning the Methodists, and an LDS person today questioning whether or not calling Elder Christofferson to the Quorum of the Twelve is inspired. We know what the truth is and where to find it. Back in his day, Joseph Smith did not have that luxury.
Lastly I just want to mention one thing about the term “blind obedience”, which Mormons are accused of all the time. ”LDS mom” might even think that “blind obedience” is what everyone in the Church does and not her. Elder R. Conrad Schultz said this in an article written in 2002:
One of the sneaky ploys of the adversary is to have us believe that unquestioning obedience to the principles and commandments of God is blind obedience. His goal is to have us believe that we should be following our own worldly ways and selfish ambitions. This he does by persuading us that “blindly” following the prophets and obeying the commandments is not thinking for ourselves. He teaches that it is not intelligent to do something just because we are told to do so by a living prophet or by prophets who speak to us from the scriptures.
Our unquestioning obedience to the Lord’s commandments is not blind obedience. President Boyd K. Packer of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles taught us about this in the April 1983 conference: “Latter-day Saints are not obedient because they are compelled to be obedient. They are obedient because they know certain spiritual truths and have decided, as an expression of their own individual agency, to obey the commandments of God. … We are not obedient because we are blind, we are obedient because we can see.”
Sorry this is so long people, this is what has been on my mind on this Sunday.
Filed under: Uncategorized | 1 Comment »